Leprechaun Laughs # 189 Wednesday April 17, 2013

celtic cattiness complete



Opening Logo 9

Coffee MExican Take over

Damn Barista! Way to scare me awake! Well played!



Job interview:

“What’s your greatest weakness?”


“I don’t think honesty is a weakness.”

“I don’t give a fuck what you think.”

To say nothing of Connecticut’s draconianly restrictive gun laws.






This is one of the cleverest E-mails I’ve received in a while.
Someone out there must be “deadly” at Scrabble.
Wait till you see the last one!

It’s going to be  hard to top because it fits to a “T”

When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:



When you rearrange the letters:

When you rearrange the letters:

When you rearrange the letters:

When you rearrange the letters:

When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:


When you rearrange the letters:





When you rearrange the letters:




A young man with his pants hanging half off his backside, two gold front teeth, and a half inch thick gold chain around his neck; walked into the local welfare office to pick up his check.

He marched up to the counter and said, “Hi. You know, I just HATE drawing welfare. I’d really rather have a job.. I don’t like taking advantage of the system, getting something for nothing.”

The social worker behind the counter said “Your timing is excellent. We Just got a job opening from a very wealthy old man who wants a chauffeur and bodyguard for his beautiful daughter. You’ll have to drive around in his 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL, and he will supply all of your clothes.”
“Because of The long hours, meals will be provided. You’ll also be expected to escort the daughter on her overseas holiday trips. This is rather awkward to say But you will also have, as part of your job, the assignment to satisfy her sexual urges as the daughter is in her mid-20’s and has a rather strong sex drive.”

The guy, just plain wide-eyed, said, “You’re bullshittin’ me!”

The social worker said, “Yeah, well… You started it.” . ….




Awarded to Ron Paul for the following thoughtless shameful & asinine social media comment:


We find there to be insufficient spin the the UNIVERSE sir to ever portray this foot in mouth comment in a positive light.

We here at DL/LL Electronic Media Enterprises have only this to say to you (aside from the obvious we shall never vote for you now):



Where Liberals Come From

An elderly man suffered a massive heart attack.
His family drove wildly to get him to the emergency room.

After what seemed like hours, the ER doctor appeared wearing his scrubs and a long face.  Sadly he said, “I’m afraid Grandpa is brain dead, but his heart is still beating.”

“Oh dear God” cried his wife, her hands clasped against her cheeks with shock. “We’ve never had a Democrat in the family before.”




By the time the government is through, I suspect we will all be criminals.  He has got to be stopped with this takeover of our lives.  Read the comments after the article, many of them are quite good. Go ahead its ok I’ll wait.

Now Obama targets your FedEx, UPS packages

Shipper warns move ‘has potential to threaten privacy of all customers’

The Obama administration is demanding the nation’s two biggest shipping companies police the contents of Americans’ sealed packages, and a FedEx spokesman is warning that the move “has the potential to threaten the privacy of all customers that send or receive packages.”

See the article here: http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/now-big-brother-targets-your-fedex-ups-packages/

Just like Soviet Russia., the government would have everyone spying on and informing on everyone else they come in contact with to them. Nothing like getting those you want to oppress to help you do it to themselves!


doing it right

Judge fines self over cellphone

District judge in Michigan holds himself in contempt of court

Published On: Apr 15 2013 09:43:39 AM CDT

Too often it seems that the rules do not apply to those in power either they craft them so that they are not subject to them (Congress) or think that they are above them (papers are full of these instances). So when someone who has made the rules breaks the rules and hangs himself for it I think they deserve special mention and an atta-boy for their example.

A judge in Michigan held himself to the law, fining himself after his cellphone went off in court.

District Judge Raymond Voet has a strict policy against cellphones, stating that any electronic device causing a disturbance in court will result in a fine and contempt of court citation, the Sentinel-Standard of Iona reported.

During closing arguments in a domestic violence trial last Friday, Voet’s touchscreen smartphone began asking him for voice commands from his shirt pocket.

“I’m guessing I bumped it. It started talking really loud, saying ‘I can’t understand you. Say something like Mom,'” Voet told the Sentinel-Standard. “My face got as red as a beet.”

During the next recess, Voet held himself in contempt of court and paid $25 for the infraction, according to MLive.com.

“Judges are humans,” he told MLive.com. “They’re not above the rules. I broke the rule and I have to live by it.

Michigan District Judge Raymond Voet we here at DL/LL Enterprises applaud your admirable ethics and standards. You are hereby awarded one:




Stupid Really Is Banner

Inmate, 84, accused of trying to kill prosecutor

Posted:  04/15/2013 2:16 PM http://mobile.chron.com/chron/db_310883/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=nqFZiRCY&pn=0&full=true#display

CONROE, Texas (AP) — An 84-year-old woman jailed on a theft charge allegedly tried to hire a hit man to kill the Houston-area prosecutor handling her case and to maim his boss, one of the apparent targets said Monday.

Montgomery County District Attorney Brett Ligon said Dorothy Canfield allegedly sought to have him attacked and his assistant district attorney, Rob Freyer, slain. Neither man was injured in the alleged plot, which investigators said surfaced in early April.

Canfield faces charges of solicitation of capital murder and solicitation to commit aggravated assault on a public servant, Ligon said. Authorities allege Canfield told other jail inmates of her plans to seek someone to kill Freyer and attack Ligon.

She was being held in jail in Conroe, about 30 miles north of Houston, on a property theft charge. Bond was set at $500,000 in the theft case. Canfield’s attorney on the theft case did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Canfield allegedly wanted the attacks to appear similar to the recent unsolved killings of two other Texas prosecutors, Kaufman County District Attorney Mike McLelland and Assistant District Attorney Mark Hasse, according to Ligon. McLelland and his wife were found dead in their homes on March 28, about two months after Hasse was fatally shot outside the local courthouse.

An undercover law enforcement agent posed as a hit man and visited Canfield in jail earlier this month, according to investigators. She allegedly suggested throwing investigators off her trail by making the alleged hits on the Montgomery County prosecutors appear to be linked to the Kaufman County slayings.

Canfield’s theft case involves allegations that she posted as an immigration attorney to bilk clients. Canfield is not a lawyer, Ligon said.

The solicitation charges announced Monday by Ligon were not immediately listed in online court records, though investigators were expected to release more information later Monday.

The deaths of the Kaufman County prosecutors were among several recent high-profile law enforcement killings, including the shooting earlier this month of a southern West Virginia sheriff and the March slaying of Colorado’s prison chief.

That’s one MEAN and NASTY Grandma! I’ll bet if a Rattler bite her the snake would die!




The Truth about “Assault Weapons”

You want to see it? Then quitcherbitchin and go to the blog like you’re supposed to!


Now with that clearly definitive lesson on what is and is NOT an “Assault Weapon” in mind we have to ask ourselves the following question:

Why does Obama fear an armed citizenry?

Joseph Farah pits president’s actions against words of our founders 04/08/2013

Barack Obama recently made some extraordinary statements about gun ownership that need a thorough refutation.

Not only did Obama misrepresent the very reason the Bill of Rights includes a specific protection of the unalienable right to bear arms, he also misrepresented his own personal position, which is clearly for the ban of most firearms currently owned by Americans.

Here’s what he said in Colorado last week: “The opponents of some of these common-sense laws have ginned up fears among responsible gun owners that have nothing to do with what’s being proposed, nothing to do with the facts, but feeds into this suspicion about government. You hear some of these quotes:

  • ‘I need a gun to protect myself from the government.’
  • ‘We can’t do background checks because the government’s going to come take my guns away.’


    “The government’s us,” Obama continued. “These officials are elected by you. They are elected by you, I am elected by you. I am constrained as they are constrained by a system that our founders put in place. This is a government of and by and for the people. So surely we can have a debate that’s not based on the notion somehow that your elected representatives are trying to do something to you other than potentially prevent another group of families from grieving the way the families of Aurora or Newtown or Columbine have grieved. We’ve got to get past some of the rhetoric that gets perpetuated that breaks down trust and is so over the top that it just shuts down all discussion. And it’s important for all of us when we hear that talk to say ‘hold on a second.’ If there are any folks out there right now who are gun owners and you’ve been hearing that someone is taking away your guns, get the facts! We’re not proposing a gun registration system. We’re proposing background checks for criminals. Don’t just listen to what some advocates or folks who have an interest in this are saying. Look at the actual legislation. That’s what happened here in Colorado. And hopefully if we know the facts and we’re listening to each other, then we can actually move forward.”

    Obama makes light of the argument that free citizens have a right and duty to be armed and vigilant to protect their liberty – including from government. But, it’s not some crazy idea. It is exactly what the men who drafted and ratified the Second Amendment believed.

    James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers: “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”

    Thomas Jefferson wrote in a proposal for the Virginia Constitution: “No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

    Again, James Madison wrote in support of the Second Amendment: “The right of the people to keep and bear … arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country. …”

    George Mason said: “… to disarm the people – that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

    Noah Webster wrote: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

    Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers: “… but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights. …”

    Samuel Adams said: “The Constitution shall never be construed … to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”

    Richard Henry Lee, the initiator of the Declaration of Independence and a member of the Senate that passed the Bill of Rights, wrote: “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them.”

    Again, Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers: “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”

    Again, Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter quoted frequently by leftists of the 1960s and 1970s: “And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. … The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

    Patrick Henry said: “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”

    The intent of the founders couldn’t be clearer. In fact, I defy any proponent of further federal firearms restrictions to find even a single quote from a single founder to support their attacks on the Constitution. They can’t do it. Yet the record of support for the protection of firearms ownership by these men would fill volumes.

    Obama argues that he is not supportive of gun bans. But the record is equally clear he is – and always has been.

    In 1996, while still in Chicago, Obama supported a ban on handguns. In 1998, he supported a ban on all semiautomatic guns, which represent the vast majority of firearms currently owned by citizens in the U.S. In 2004, he advocated banning gun sales within five miles of a school or park (essentially a ban on virtually all gun stores). He served on the board of directors of the Joyce Foundation, the largest private funder of research seeking ways to ban gun ownership in the U.S.

    When Obama ran for the Illinois state Senate, he was asked by Independent Voters of Illinois if he supported a “ban [on] the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns.” He responded “Yes.” Later, when he ran for president, he flatly denied making the statement and attributed it to a staffer from his Senate race. The problem for Obama is that the questionnaire includes his own handwritten notes to at least one answer. Another questionnaire provided by Illinois State Legislative National Political Awareness Test in 1998 found that Obama wanted to “ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons.”

    He is also on record in opposition to current laws in 48 states permitting citizens to carry concealed handguns for protection. About concealed carry laws, Obama said, “I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.” Of course, the statistics prove just the opposite.

    But the Obama record gets worse.

    In March 2004, the Illinois Senate passed Senate Bill 2165, a law with provisions designed to assert a right of citizens to protect themselves against home invasions so that self-defense requirements would take precedence over local ordinances against handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20. Barack Obama was one of the 20 state senators voting against the measure.

    Then Gov. Rod Blagojevich vetoed the bill. On Nov. 9, 2004, the Illinois Senate voted 40-18 to override Blagojevich’s veto. Again, Obama acted against the override.

    It’s fair to conclude, with Obama in January issuing 23 executive actions with gun-control provisions, that he not only hates private ownership of most, if not all, firearms, but he is obsessed with imposing restrictions. { http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2013/01/16/here-are-the-23-executive-orders-on-gun-safety-signed-today-by-the-president/}

    More to the point, just do a reality check for a moment: Does anyone genuinely have any doubt that Obama would like to impose draconian gun control regulations on Americans? Will anyone seriously try to defend such a claim?

    Again, Obama has a historical pattern of taking strong anti-gun positions, only to attempt later to obscure them. His website once said there were only two reasons for private gun ownership: “Hunting and target shooting.” Later the website was scrubbed when it became an embarrassment and a politically inexpedient and indefensible position.

    Why does Obama speak out of both sides of his mouth on the gun issue? In 2008, Democrat pollster Mark Penn explained the doublespeak: “The formula for Democrats is to say that they support the Second Amendment, but that they want tough laws that close loopholes. This is something (Democrats) can run on and win on.”

    In other words, don’t pay attention so much to what Obama says, watch what he does. What he says changes with the political winds. What he does has not changed through his political life.

    Leprechaun-Running-With-A-Beer-And-Flag Closing

  • About lethalleprechaun

    I believe in being the kind of man who, when my feet touch the floor in the morn', causes the Devil to say "BUGGER ME! HIMSELF IS UP!" ======== I'm a White Married Heterosexual who fervently believes in the war(s) we are fighting, the Second Amendment which I plan on defending with my last breath and my last round of ammunition as well as Arizona's stringent law on Immigration and the need for the border wall. I'm a right of center Con-centrist with Tea Party & Republican sympathies who drives an SUV. I am a Life Time Member of the NRA, a Charter Member of the Patriots' Border Alliance and North American Hunters Association. If there is a season for it and I can shoot one I'll eat it and proudly wear its fur. I believe PETA exists solely to be a forum for Gays, Vegetarians, Hollywood snobbery to stupid to get into politics and Soybean Growers. The ACLU stopped protecting our civil liberties sometime after the 1960s and now serves its own bigoted headline grabbing agenda much in the same way as the Southern Poverty Law Center. I am ecstatic that WE the PEOPLE finally got mad enough to rise up and take back the Government from WE the ENTITLED and reverently wish the Liberals would just get over the loss and quit whining/protesting all the time. After all they're just reaping what they've sown. I am Pro-choice both when it comes to the issue of abortion AND school prayer. I believe in a government for the people, by the people which represents and does the people's will. Therefore I an Pro States rights and mandatory term limits but against special interest group campaign contributions and soft money. I think that sports teams who allow their players to sit or take a knee during the National Anthem should be boycotted until the message is received that this is not acceptable behavior for role models for children. I believe Congressional salaries should be voted on bi-annually by the people they represent and not by themselves. I think Congress should be subject to every law they pass on the populace including any regarding Social Security or Healthcare. Speaking of the Healthcare bill (or con job as I see it) I hope Trump will overturn it and set things back to normal. I oppose the building of an Mosque or ANY Islamic center at or within a 10 mile radius of Ground Zero in New York. I will fight those in favor of this until hell freezes over and then I will continue to fight it hand to hand on the ice. Further I think the ban on immigrants from certain nations known to harbor and promote terrorism is a justified measure, at least until we can come up with better methods of vetting and tracking those non citizens we allow in the country. We did not inflict this measure on them those who refuse to point out, denounce or fight radical religious terrorism brought this upon themselves.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

    1 Response to Leprechaun Laughs # 189 Wednesday April 17, 2013

    1. shaun_waters says:

      Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve read your stuff previously and you are just extremely fantastic. I really like what you have say here and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable but you still take care of to keep it sensible. I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is actually a terrific web site.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

    Google photo

    You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

    Connecting to %s